
After a break-in, assault, or robbery at your apartment, you may wonder whether the property owner shares the blame. It is a fair question, and in Oklahoma, the answer is sometimes yes. If you were harmed because of weak security, you may be able to sue your apartment complex for inadequate security in Tulsa.
A landlord is not responsible for every crime. But when a complex ignores known dangers and a tenant gets hurt, the law can hold it accountable.
As a rule, a landlord is not an insurer of your safety and is not automatically liable when a stranger commits a crime. Oklahoma courts have carved out specific situations where a property owner can be on the hook.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court laid out the two cornerstones in Cordes v. Wood: foreseeability and exclusivity of control. In plain terms, the owner must have been able to see the danger coming and must have controlled the part of the property that failed.
An earlier case, Lay v. Dworman, held that when a landlord controls things like locks, gates, and lighting, it can be liable when a broken or missing safeguard leaves a tenant exposed to a crime the owner could reasonably have prevented.
Inadequate security is more than a single burned-out bulb.
Common examples include:
Oklahoma’s landlord-tenant law (41 O.S. § 118) also requires owners to keep common areas in safe condition.
A negligent security claim is a type of premises liability case, so you generally have to show four things:
Foreseeability is usually the battleground. Prior crimes on the property or nearby, a string of break-ins, or written complaints about a broken gate all help show the owner should have acted. The more a landlord knew, the stronger your case.
This part trips up many landlords. If your lease or the leasing office advertised gated access, security patrols, or working cameras, the complex took on a higher duty to keep those promises. When the marketing says “secure, gated community” but the gate has been broken for months, that gap becomes powerful evidence.
Oklahoma follows comparative negligence under 23 O.S. § 13. If the complex claims you share some blame, you can still recover as long as your share was 50% or less, and your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault. Expect the insurance company to try to pin part of the blame on you, which is one reason early legal help matters.
Most injury claims in Oklahoma, including negligent security, must be filed within two years under 12 O.S. § 95. Claims against a city or public housing authority can carry much shorter notice deadlines, so do not wait to get advice.
These cases are won with proof, and proof disappears quickly. Helpful evidence includes:
A lawyer can also send a letter demanding the complex preserve its records before they vanish.
If you were attacked or robbed at your apartment, you do not have to accept the owner’s claim that nothing could have been done. You may have the right to sue your apartment complex for inadequate security and to recover for medical bills, lost income, and the harm you carry afterward.
222 Injury Lawyers has recovered more than $80 million for Oklahomans by standing up to large property owners and their insurance companies. We believe in protecting the little guy, and we work on contingency, so you pay nothing unless we win.
Contact us for a review of your case.
222 Injury Lawyers, PLLC
7301 Broadway Ext Suite 222
Oklahoma City, OK 73116
Fields Marked With An * Are Required
222 Injury Lawyers, PLLC
1217 E 33rd St.
Tulsa, OK 74105
*Please send all mail correspondence to this location